by Jeff Probst » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:11:43 pm
by Sophie » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:14:07 pm
by Jeff Probst » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:15:21 pm
Sophie wrote:Yeah no kidding, jesus christ that was annoying. We beat you in the game grant, and I'm sorry that it hurt so bad to be outlasted by a bitch like me but I did it. I am proud of my game, and if I lost in the finals oh well. I am proud of my game and I made enough moves to back that up.
Some of the best game-playing I have done I believe, and some of the best 26 days on the internet that I have had :)
by Grant » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:15:50 pm
Jeff Probst wrote:Hopefully Grant won't be such a bitter bitch about it! Welcome!
by Cochran » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:17:30 pm
Sophie wrote:Yeah no kidding, jesus christ that was annoying. We beat you in the game grant, and I'm sorry that it hurt so bad to be outlasted by a bitch like me but I did it. I am proud of my game, and if I lost in the finals oh well. I am proud of my game and I made enough moves to back that up.
by Sophie » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:17:32 pm
Grant wrote:GG Sophie!
Sorry about the badgering faces, I feel like you gave a healthy dose of bullshit and I was afraid one of my guys was going to buy into it (it wouldn't be the first time).
You played a really good game and you have a lot of reading to do already here in Ponderosa to get caught up. No hard feelings on my end. I was a fan of your game moves, not so much the mouth attached to them.Jeff Probst wrote:Hopefully Grant won't be such a bitter bitch about it! Welcome!
lol.
by Grant » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:25:12 pm
by Sophie » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:28:51 pm
Grant wrote:I think you will be surprised to see how much game Ashley was actually dishing, or maybe you won't. I aligned with her immediately after the tribe swap and was willing to work with her throughout the game. She had me completely duped as to what my relationship with her was (gamewise or otherwise).
You played a good game, don't get me wrong I respect your game 100%. You got me out, great job. You outlasted me and many many other people, awesome job on that.
I just wasn't a fan of the talk. That's all. If I was mad about you getting me out, I'd be mad at Julie and Whitney as well, wouldn't I? :)
by Grant » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:51:52 pm
by Julie » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:38:22 am
by Sophie » Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:03:06 am
Grant wrote:Again, I give all four of you props. I'm honestly perfectly ok with when I went out now. I was a little butthurt that people lied to me but that's the name of the game. I got over it. I'm honestly not bitter. I was in an alliance with Mike/Steph/David since like Day #5, the four of us. I'm "living" the game vicariously through the three of them, because that is who I am rooting for. I'd like to see my alliance succeed. I also think Ashley played a very good game, but from what you're telling me, it was you and not her who played such a good game?? What voting me out early did for me was it made me not have to make any tough decisions. I didn't have to turn on anyone. I didn't have to bother with HIIs and I didn't have to bother with immunity challenges such as the most recent one that I still don't understand how it works. Believe me, I'm not bitter and I'm relieved to be out of the game seeing what you guys are doing now. I'd like to be in the game, of course, but I don't envy you guys. I was playing the game hard, I guess you could say, so it was relieving to be able to turn that off. I told you before I wasn't going to be a bitter juror, I didn't plan to at any point except for maybe the day after I got voted out but I assure you if you made it to the end and presented a case, I would have been completely open to voting for you. I've presented your case to win and how the Ovambo-3 need to get you out because you will the win.
I keep saying your game was all talk. I think you are misinterpreting that as saying you played a good game but I think you did not. That is not what I mean. You (and Ashley) clearly had Julie and Whitney wrapped around your finger(s). I honestly believed you had David at least twice. You were making valid points, the only problem was they, in more cases than not, were either irrelevant or just wrong. I do admit I thought it was all Ashley and less you, I even put that into writing here somewhere. If I'm wrong, I apologize for not giving you proper credit. When all is said and done, if you were a machine on the social game, I will once again apologize for not giving you your due credit, I just didn't see it.
by Whitney » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:03:08 pm
by Sophie » Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:15:35 pm
by Grant » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:20:40 pm
Sophie wrote:I understand that you are rooting for your alliance a lot, but I think what is so bothersome is that you are doing it so blindly and clearly are not presented by much facts about how much those three have done in the game. For example, Mike. Mike has literally done nothing to set himself apart from the other two. Stephanie has carried him along to this point, and she'll continue to do so if she wins this immunity challenge.
Sophie wrote:Don't get me wrong, Ashley IS playing a good game and I was not saying at all that she played a lesser game than me. She is in the final four for christ sake, but I will say that the move to get both you out and Kristina out came from my idea. I started talking to you on Day Four when I came over to the Ovambo Tribe as the mole. The second you responded I knew I hated your guts and was going to make it my personal mission to get rid of you in this game before I went out. You were too over-dramatic and you analyzed things way too much. You had no personality or flair which makes you fun, and so right away I had no intention to ever REALLY work with you in the game.
Sophie wrote:Lol, well that's what playing a game is all about Grant. Turning on each other, voting each other out, and hidden immunity idols. "What do you think this is, Brunch?" (-Jeff Probst) Honestly you definitely wish you were still in the game, and I understand why you would want to cover it up and have no problem with that at all. I'm relieved that I made it this far, but of course I am upset I couldn't get just one spot further! I think that I would not have won against Ashley because of you Grant, and that is only because of what you spout here. But I'll get to that later in here.
Sophie wrote:After about a week in this game I get rid of Semhar and for the first time turn my back on an ally. I pitched the idea to Papa Bear after he said he was upset that she didn't compete in many challenges to get rid of her now, and I wanted to get her out because Whitney was much more controllable and getting rid of Ashley was off the table. In a 5-1 vote, Semhar went home and the rest was a stepping stone to how I got to the final five. All Talk? That's called all game.
Sophie wrote:I made a true mission to make sure I talked to people about things outside the game, because people forget that this IS just a game. I likedtalking about stupid things like Survivor and Game of Thrones when I got too tired of typing away the same repetitive messages to different people. The first person I really connected to personally out here was Cochran because he didn't MIND talking about things outside of the game. Even in team challenges I was communicating with your team and making stupid comments that had no affect on the game. I don't play like you Grant, I can't be a game-bot and just be a solemn bitch the entire length of the game.
Sophie wrote:Tribal council #4 of the merge. I know that I am going to be getting votes and maybe enough to send me home because Mike was stupid enough to send me something saying that I would need that immunity idol or something idiotic like that. I had to decide whether to be selfish and use it on myself or actually show where my true loyalties in this game were. NOBODY else in the merge or in the pre-merge played an idol on someone else, and so I urge you to look at that move and tell me it was all-talk. Did it matter that I play it? Absolutely not, and I am not saying it did. But I think to say that move was all talk is the biggest load of horse shit you've spewed in your entire short game that you played.
Sophie wrote:Please answer me this Grant. How would you know the points were wrong if you were sitting here in the losers section of the game? You have been out of the game for EIGHT days and were not there when we were and not strategizing at all with us. You have no idea the deals that went down, and why people turned on other people to get farther in the game. And that is what is so funny about this situation. I like that you are being so active in here, but you are showing something that is very common in middle-aged women on the jury….Bitter Bitch Syndrome. I suggest that you look at who really outplayed you in this game, and then look at who merely outlasted you.
Sophie wrote:The only thing I am bitter about is David's performance at the tribal council and that he kept pretending like he was going to go for Mike. Grant, I know you have a huge man-boner for those Man-Goats but that was just absurd. There is no reason to make a tribal council a performance or a music, just be honest and not try and rub salt in the wound of the person you are voting out right?
by Sophie » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:48:54 pm
by Ralph » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:30:39 pm
Sophie wrote:Grant wrote:GG Sophie!
Sorry about the badgering faces, I feel like you gave a healthy dose of bullshit and I was afraid one of my guys was going to buy into it (it wouldn't be the first time).
You played a really good game and you have a lot of reading to do already here in Ponderosa to get caught up. No hard feelings on my end. I was a fan of your game moves, not so much the mouth attached to them.Jeff Probst wrote:Hopefully Grant won't be such a bitter bitch about it! Welcome!
lol.
Part of my plan to come in here was to just have fun. I didn't want to be a game bot like Mike and Ashley and have no personality. I wanted to be like Sophie. Loud, Abbrasive, and blessed with a mouth like a sailor. Did I accomplish that? Well i certainly accomplished the fun part.
I just had a blast getting to meet everyone. When Ashley came in nobody wanted to work with her, but I knew that I could at least guide her to make the moves that I wanted her to make, and it worked out extremely well.
by Grant » Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:35:18 pm
by Sophie » Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:38:21 pm
won't go through and touch on everything but again I don't think you were just a "talker", that's not what I meant by "all talk". I think you were a talker and an effective one at that, I just felt (past tense - I am, was and always will be open minded to hearing otherwise) like there was not a lot to back that up. The second thing I wanted to touch on was you saying you'd consider voting Stephanie 70% if she makes it - it seemed in one of your previous messages that you said you were definitely already decided to vote for Ashley if she makes it. It's fine if you want to vote for her, if she makes it I might too. However what seemed to me as closed-mindedness was cleared up and I'm glad to see you will be open-minded as I intended to be all along. Trust me, I may have had ideas for who I think I will or would have voted for but I fully expect(ed) to have my mind changed over and over again, whether it was in favor of you, Ashley, Stephanie, David or Mike (or even Julie if you want to go back that far). The 6 of you played very, very good games, there is no denying that. You all played better than me. I apologize for getting a little defensive. When I mentioned Ashley/Julie, I was specifying to just that one play. There is no doubt in my mind all of you outplayed me, as you made it further and I'm sorry if I misunderstood where you were going with it.
by Grant » Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:37:23 pm
by Sophie » Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:59:37 pm
Grant wrote:Fair enough. From the looks of it, Steph is probably going to win immunity and it would be dumb of Mike to get rid of David and dumb of David to get rid of Mike. It makes the most sense for all three of them to get rid of Ashley, considering her connections on the jury - Cochran, PB, me, Kristina, Whitney, Julie and you all working with (or being played by) her. It'd be too risky to keep her in the game.